Hilchos Choshen Mishpat
Volume I : Number 7
Amateur Real Estate Agents
A Yeshiva student, who recently became engaged, asked a friend if he knew
of a home for sale in a certain neighborhood. The friend mentioned to him
a possible home for sale that he happened to know about in that
The student then went with his bride, parents, and future in-laws to see
the home. After tedious, difficult, negotiations, the young couple
purchased the home.
The friend who originally suggested the home is now requesting a finders
fee, as is customary to pay a professional real-estate buyer's agent who
suggests a home on which a deal is finalized. The Yeshiva student
counters that he should not be obligated to pay his friend the finders
fee for the following reasons:
- He had asked his friend as a favor, with no intention of paying him.
- Since the friend is not a professional, licensed, real estate agent,
he is undeserving of any fee. The most that he is willing to do is to buy
him a nice present, or pay him a token amount.
- Even if the friend is considered an agent, since he only suggested the
home but was not involved in the negotiations at all, the most that he
should receive is the fee of someone who suggests a business deal. The
going rate for that is 1/3 of the full fee of a professional broker.
What is the Halacha?
- If the friend who suggested the home admits that at the time that he
mentioned it, he had no intention of demanding a fee and did it as a
favor, he has no right to claim any fees at all.
However, if the friend claims that he never intended to suggest it for
free, he planned on eventually collecting a fee (or even if he didn't
have any specific intention at all) - he has a right to collect full
payment; the amount that would be collected by a professional, licensed,
real estate agent in his area.
- If it is known that in their area the custom is to pay an amateur
"agent" a minimal fee, he could only claim the minimal amount. However,
in places where this is not clearly the custom, the agent should receive
the full fee, as stated above.
The Rema in Choshen Mishpat 264:4 states, "Any person who does work, or a
favor for his friend, the recipient is not able to say, you did this for
free because I didn't ask you (to do it), rather he must pay him his
It is clear from the Rema that any person, regardless of age or
expertise, who does a service for his friend, if it is customary to pay
for this service in that area, the service provider has a right to
demand payment. The recipient is unable to argue, "You were just doing me
It is also clear from the first part of this Halacha, and from the Biur
HaGra there (13) that anytime that someone is interested in having work
done for him, even if it was done without his request,he must pay for the
work. The source of this obligation is the Gemara in Bava Kamma (101a)
that discusses the Din of "a gardener who goes down and plants in
someone's field without his permission." [Obviously, this Halacha needs
to be carefully applied. The recipient of the service only needs to pay
the amount that he benefits from the service. There are many variables
that need to be taken into consideration, such as quality of performance
and the type of work that was desired.]
However, the Nesivos Mishpat (12:5) states that if the intention of the
worker when he did the work was to do it for free, and only after
completing the work did he decide that he would like to get paid for it,
he does not have the right to demand payment.
I would like to add that it is customary among real estate agents (and
among Shadchanim), that if two people are involved in a match,the one who
suggested it receives 1/3 of the fee, and the person who carried out the
negotiations and pushed the deal through receives 2/3 of the fee.
However, this is only if the second person who pushed it through is
unrelated to either party. But, if an agent suggested a deal, and the
parties themselves negotiated and pushed it through, the agent who
suggested it receives the entire fee. It is considered as if he is the
sole agent involved, and the parties who negotiated cannot subtract from
This class is translated and moderated by Rabbi Aaron Tendler of Yeshivas
Ner Yisroel in Baltimore. Rabbi Tendler accepts full responsibility for
the accuracy of the translation and will be happy to fax originals of the
articles in Hebrew to anyone interested.
Feedback is appreciated! It can be sent to email@example.com.
We hope you find this class informative and stimulating! If you do not see a subscription form to the left
of the screen, access the Advanced Learning Network to
subscribe to Business-Halacha.
For information on subscriptions, archives, and other Project Genesis
classes, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org for an automated reply. For
subscription assistance, send mail to email@example.com.
Please Note: The purpose of this column is to make people aware of Choshen Mishpat
situations that can arise at any time, and the Halachic concepts that may be used to resolve them. Each
individual situation must be resolved by an objective, competent Bais Din (or Rabbinic Arbitrator) in the
presence of all parties involved!
NETZAVIM AND VAYEILECH:
One Teaspoon, Or Two?
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5764
Touching One's Essence
Rabbi Yosef Kalatzky - 5771
This Time, Let's Do It Right
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5764
Submit, Admit, and Fix It!
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5757
Shlomo Katz - 5761
A Timeless Moment
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5759
A Final Warning
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5769
Prayer with Legs to Stand On
Shlomo Katz - 5773
The Difference Between The Two Tochachas
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5772
Moshe Rabeinu's Last Day
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5758
Teshuva Must Take Into Account the Root Cause of Sin
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5770
Standing By The Covenant
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5765
Rabbi Mordechai Kamentezky - 5760
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5757
The Doors to Teshuva Never Fully Close
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5766
Just One More!
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5756