Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Korach

The machlokes (dispute) instigated by Korach was not for the sake of Heaven and therefore is not everlasting, while the Talmudic disputes between Hillel and Shamai were for the sake of Heaven and therefore are everlasting. (Pirkei Avos 5:20) This is counter-intuitive. We always appreciate peace and harmony, so wouldn't we expect a 'good' dispute to eventually dissipate while it would be the 'bad' dispute that lasts forever?

Korach's reputation is deeply associated with machlokes. Nonetheless, his proposal was that everyone is equal and that there was therefore no need for Moshe's leadership. In a sense, then, he was against having chilukim/differences and he favored equality, so why is he viewed as the ultimate in machlokes/divisiveness?

There is a fundamental distinction between shalom/peace, on the one hand, and equality/no differences, on the other.

Shalom does not mean we are the same; in fact it means that we recognize that we are different from one another and that each of us has a unique role to play in serving the larger cause of Klal Yisroel's mission in this world.

For example, shalom bayis (domestic tranquility) doesn't mean that the two individuals are exactly alike and therefore get along; rather it means that in spite of their very different natures they work harmoniously together in pursuing common goals. The peacefulness lies in accepting the differences and agreeing to work side-by-side toward the common goal. Similarly, Rashi says that the plague of hail was comprised of fire and water and that, in order to serve their Creator, the two opposing elements made peace. (Parshas Vo'era 9:24)

Conversely, machlokes means refusing to recognize that different people have different roles as a result of their unique and innate talents and characteristics; I want everyone to be the same even though really we're not. This is, of course, folly. And anyone who asserts that there are no differences between us (and that therefore there should be no separation of roles) is necessarily carrying an agenda - logically it otherwise makes no sense to blatantly ignore obvious differences. In Korach's case this agenda was his own jealousy of the position of Kohen Gadol (High Priest) which he coveted.

[This is based on a shiur of HoRav Yochanan Zweig, Shlita.]


Gal Einai, Copyright © 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org


 


ARTICLES ON MIKETZ AND CHANUKAH:

View Complete List

Don't Be Jealous!
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5755

“So you Think You’re The Man, Alexander?” (Insights for Chanukah)
Jon Erlbaum - 0

The Hasmoneans Take a Stand: A History of Chanukah, Part II
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5774

ArtScroll

What You See & What You Get
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5756

Waning or Waxing
Rabbi Label Lam - 5774

Holy Eyes
Rabbi Label Lam - 5772

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Tears
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5767

Days of Eight
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

A Glaring Omission
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5766

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Light From Darkness, Take Two
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5766

What A Pity!
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5760

Thanks for What?
Shlomo Katz - 5774

> To Fergin Or Forget
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5771

The Ideal Answer, or the Answer of Ideals
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5759

Paint the World with Light
Rabbi Label Lam - 5775

Bit By Bit
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5759



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information