Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Miketz

During the famine Yaakov tells his sons to go down from Eretz Yisroel to Egypt to buy food. 42:2. "R'du shama v'shivru lanu misham - go down there and buy food for us from there". Rashi says that Yaakov didn't say "l'chu - go", rather he said "r'du-go down"; and the reason for this is that the 210 gematria of r'du functions as a hint to the 210 years of enslavement in Egypt.

There are numerous examples of Rashi explaining elsewhere that Eretz Yisroel is on a higher plane than all other lands and that therefore it is apporpriate to speak of going up to or down from Eretz Yisroel.

If so, why isn't r'du appropriate for this pasuk where the instrcution is to go down from Eretz Yisroel? On the strength of this diffuculty many m'forshei Rashi delete the first clause from this Rashi. According to them Rashi is saying simply, without pointing out anything curious about the terminology, that the 210 r'du equals the 210 years. If we follow these m'forshim and delete the clause, however, we still must explain how Yaakov's use of r'du hints at anything deeper - it would only be a hint if the terminology would be somewhat unusual or unexpected - if it is exactly what we expect to hear then how can a deeper, alternative meaning be discerned?

Rashi's dibur hamatchil, his quote from the pasuk that he uses as the starting point for his comment, is an integral part of his commentary. In this case, a careful reading of the dibur hamatchil reveals the answer to the question above. Rashi's dibur hamatchil is "r'du shama - go down there"; if Rashi wanted to tell us about the r'du=210 connection the dibur hamatchil could have been simply "r'du" - why "r'du shama"?

Rashi's real issue in this pasuk is that it says both shama and misham - "Go down THERE and buy us food from THERE". By Rashi using the two word dibur hamatchil he is indicating his concern over the word shama. Rashi's question is why is it neccesary. His answer is that it is repeated so that there will be a two word hint to the length of the enslavement - r'du shama - there you will be 210. R'du is the right word to use, but by adding a redundant shama the pasuk is hinting at the 210 years. (See Maskil L'Dovid and other m'forshei Rashi.)

[According to those who retain the first clause in this Rashi, and Rashi is expressing a clearly stated question about the terminology (but not about the redundancy of sham/misham), it is useful to note as a general matter that whenever Rashi articluates his question you can be pretty sure that the real issue he is addressing, as always, remains unarticulated - see Maskil L'Dovid.]


Gal Einai, Copyright 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org


 






ARTICLES ON DEVARIM AND THE THREE WEEKS:

View Complete List

Golden Opportunities
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5773

Review
Shlomo Katz - 5763

What Are We Missing On Tisha B'Av?
Rabbi Label Lam - 5764

ArtScroll

In Other Words
Shlomo Katz - 5764

Love Your Neighbor
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5758

So Much to Say
Shlomo Katz - 5761

> Kamtza and Bar-Kamtza
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5758

Murphy's Day
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5761

The Foundation of Piety
Shlomo Katz - 5773

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Golden Opportunities
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5772

Fear Itself
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5758

Because of Us, not Through Us
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5770

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Small Allusions
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5767

Faithful Contentment
Rabbi Naphtali Hoff - 5774

If only . . .
Shlomo Katz - 5771

The Secret to Rebuke
Shlomo Katz - 5772



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information