Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Miketz

During the famine Yaakov tells his sons to go down from Eretz Yisroel to Egypt to buy food. 42:2. "R'du shama v'shivru lanu misham - go down there and buy food for us from there". Rashi says that Yaakov didn't say "l'chu - go", rather he said "r'du-go down"; and the reason for this is that the 210 gematria of r'du functions as a hint to the 210 years of enslavement in Egypt.

There are numerous examples of Rashi explaining elsewhere that Eretz Yisroel is on a higher plane than all other lands and that therefore it is apporpriate to speak of going up to or down from Eretz Yisroel.

If so, why isn't r'du appropriate for this pasuk where the instrcution is to go down from Eretz Yisroel? On the strength of this diffuculty many m'forshei Rashi delete the first clause from this Rashi. According to them Rashi is saying simply, without pointing out anything curious about the terminology, that the 210 r'du equals the 210 years. If we follow these m'forshim and delete the clause, however, we still must explain how Yaakov's use of r'du hints at anything deeper - it would only be a hint if the terminology would be somewhat unusual or unexpected - if it is exactly what we expect to hear then how can a deeper, alternative meaning be discerned?

Rashi's dibur hamatchil, his quote from the pasuk that he uses as the starting point for his comment, is an integral part of his commentary. In this case, a careful reading of the dibur hamatchil reveals the answer to the question above. Rashi's dibur hamatchil is "r'du shama - go down there"; if Rashi wanted to tell us about the r'du=210 connection the dibur hamatchil could have been simply "r'du" - why "r'du shama"?

Rashi's real issue in this pasuk is that it says both shama and misham - "Go down THERE and buy us food from THERE". By Rashi using the two word dibur hamatchil he is indicating his concern over the word shama. Rashi's question is why is it neccesary. His answer is that it is repeated so that there will be a two word hint to the length of the enslavement - r'du shama - there you will be 210. R'du is the right word to use, but by adding a redundant shama the pasuk is hinting at the 210 years. (See Maskil L'Dovid and other m'forshei Rashi.)

[According to those who retain the first clause in this Rashi, and Rashi is expressing a clearly stated question about the terminology (but not about the redundancy of sham/misham), it is useful to note as a general matter that whenever Rashi articluates his question you can be pretty sure that the real issue he is addressing, as always, remains unarticulated - see Maskil L'Dovid.]


Gal Einai, Copyright 2006 by Gedalia Litke and Torah.org


 

ARTICLES ON BALAK AND THE THREE WEEKS:

View Complete List

Our Achilles' Heel
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5764

A Candidate for Blessings
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768

Friendly Enemies
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5774

> A Hopeful Mourning
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5762

It's All Free Will
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5763

Father Knows Best
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5762

Looking for a Chavrusah?

In Order for Nothing to Happen
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

Behold! A Nation
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5758

Habit Forming
Rabbi Raymond Beyda - 5766

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Absolute Greatness
Rabbi Moshe Peretz Gilden - 5764

Without Cover!
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5762

Making Time
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5767

ArtScroll

'Balak' Magic
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5759

Hidden Yet Loving
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5758

If It Can Happen To Bilaam, It Can Happen to Any of Us
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5765

When Moshiach Comes
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information