Parshas Ki Savo 5757 - '97
Outline # 52
Last week, we discussed opinions concerning the Green Esrog. The Talmud concluded that the fruit is not fully developed; the commentaries maintained that as long as it would become yellow, it is the correct kind of esrog, and this is sufficient.
However, the Bach required that the esrog be completely yellow. The reason for the Bach was not that the green fruit remained unfinished, but that the Torah requires each of the four species to be "hadar" -- beautiful.
One of the topics in the Parsha concerns Ma'aser (Tithes). Here is some general information regarding Ma'aser Rishon -- The First Tenth: Produce (from Eretz Yisrael) would be tithed and given to the Levite. (At one point, Ezra fined the Levites, because of their reluctance to return to the Land, and ruled that the first tithe be given to the Kohein instead.) The Rabbis decreed that the lands in the vicinity of Eretz Yisrael be obligated in Ma'aser as well.
The fiscal year for the ma'aser of Grains and Vegetables begins with Rosh Hashanah; for fruits of trees the year begins at Tu B'shvat (15th of Shvat). Produce of one year could not be tithed together with produce from another year.
In order to be obligated in ma'aser, the produce had to be considered developed enough to be food. For vegetables, this is only after gathering. For fruits of trees, after the fruit has started to blossom (1/3 growth). This is called "onas ma'asros" -- the ma'aser period. Each species therefore has its own time period, depending on the season when it develops into a foodstuff.
Some produce only ripens after being harvested. There are certain types of dates that only become edible after being harvested. They can only be tithed when they are edible. The work, Libun Halacha argues that bananas are harvested in a hard, green state, when they are completely inedible. Traditionally, they were tithed after harvesting, before being sold. Libun Halacha writes that this is in error, for only after ripening do they first become obligated.
The esrog is somewhat similar in that it turns yellow off the tree. The Libun Halacha chides the Moadim Uzmanim, who compared the banana and the esrog. The banana is not at all fit to eat when harvested. You can only make the proper brocha when the banana turns yellow, and that is precisely when you would take the ma'aser. The esrog, as we said, is not a matter of unripe fruit. As long as it will turn yellow, it is the right type of fruit, and that's all we were looking for. As far as eating is concerned, there is no difference in the edibility of the esrog when it is green or yellow.
Some rabbis suggest purchasing the esrog before Rosh Hashanah, so that if it is green, it can be turned yellow. By placing the esrog in a box between two apples for 24 hours, the color changes. (You must wait four days after picking, and remove the esrog from the box promptly after 24 hours). This is only according to the stringent opinion of the Bach.
Well, some of us still feel green at Rosh Hashanah. We have two choices: If we have started to lighten up, we can argue that we are the right species -- we will eventually ripen! Or -- we can try to cook ourselves, and actually change color, so that by Sukos we will actually be of beautiful, ripe appearance. The choice is ours -- but time is running out, so we must hurry!
Although, traditionally, there are two days of Yom Tov, Rosh Hashanah differs from the other festivals. The two days of Rosh Hashanah have "kedushah achas" -- one sanctity -- and are treated as "yoma arichta" -- one extended day. There is much confusion about this concept; as it often happens, different sides can be found among the early authorities, and the attitudes current today, may, in fact, stem from the ancient debates.
Simply put, the decree to observe two days of Rosh Hashanah was a definite law -- not because of any doubt -- but a deliberate decision. The two days of the festivals, however, were observed in the Diaspora because those far from the Sanhedrin (high court) would not be aware of the exact date; out of doubt they had to observe two days. The Talmud concludes that both days are not jointly viewed as sanctified, rather one of the days is holy, but we are unsure which one. This is called "shtei kedushos" -- two sanctities: each day is separately sanctified, in case that day was the actual Yom Tov.
There is a legal difference between the two concepts ("kedushah achas" -- one sanctity of Rosh Hashanah, and "shtei kedushos" -- two sanctities of the festivals). If the hen laid an egg on the first day of the festival, it can be eaten on the second day, because the two days of Yom Tov cannot both be holy. This logic does not apply to Rosh Hashanah, where both days are of definite status. (Beginning of Tractate "Beitza" -- The Egg.)
It is often assumed that the One Sanctity idea of Rosh Hashanah means that the two days have identical significance; but it doesn't seem to be the case.
The Magen Avraham (585) rules regarding one who is in doubt as to whether he heard the shofar. On the first day, he should sound the tekios again, because they are a Torah requirement. On the second day, however, he need not, because the requirement of the second day is Rabbinic in nature. In a similar question, Rav Tzvi Pesach Frank (Mikra'ei Kodesh, chapter 24) was in doubt. Perhaps the concept of One Sanctity determines that the tekios of both days are of equal status? In the end, citing various sources, he also concluded that there is no obligation to be stringent on the second day.
The "common assumption," that the two days of Rosh Hashanah have identical significance, does have a source, however: the Rambam.
(Circumcision On Second Day of Festivals)
The Bris Milah (circumcision) is performed on the eighth day, and overrides Shabbos and Yom Tov. However, where it was not performed on the eighth day, it does not override Shabbos or festivals. What about the second day of Yom Tov, which is from Rabbinic decree?
The Mishnah (Shabbos, 19:5) declares that Bris Milah after the eighth day is not performed on either of the two days of Rosh Hashanah. For some reason, other festivals were not mentioned. Why was only the second day of Rosh Hashanah mentioned? The Rambam explains that this law applies precisely to Rosh Hashanah, because both days have the One Sanctity. The Bris would be performed on the second day of other festivals (even though it is not the eighth day).
The Rosh, though, disagreed. The reason the Bris would not be performed on the Second Day of Rosh Hashanah has nothing to do with One Sanctity or Two Sanctities. Bris Milah -- after the eighth day -- is not performed on any day of Yom Tov.
The Rosh explained, to his thinking, why only Rosh Hashanah had been mentioned. The authors of the Mishnah lived in Eretz Yisrael; except for Rosh Hashanah, only one day of Yom Tov is observed there. The Mishnah therefore mentions a second day Yom Tov which applied to the authors -- Rosh Hashanah. However, the law would be the same for other holidays, as well.
One question bothers us. Why, according to the Rosh, could the Bris not be performed on the second day of an ordinary festival? Apparently, the legal distinction between "One Sanctity" and "Two Sanctities" has no real significance. There is an ancient decree of two days for the festivals, and each day will be regarded as a complete Yom Tov. To the Rambam, however, only one day is truly Yom Tov (on an ordinary Yom Tov). We are inclined to say that it is the first day. Therefore, the Bris should be performed on the second day.
In Haaros 24 of this year, we showed from the Magen Avraham and Maharshal that the two days of the ordinary Yom Tov are not really considered doubtful. It may be that because of an original doubt, the decree for two days' observance was made; nonetheless, we now find ourselves with two days Yom Tov, each of which need be treated as such.
Rabbi Yaakov Bernstein
1 Babbin Court
Spring Valley, NY 10977
Text Copyright © '97 Rabbi Yaakov Bernstein and Project Genesis, Inc.
Copyright © '97 Project Genesis, Inc.firstname.lastname@example.org
3600 Crondall Lane, Suite 106
Owings Mills, MD 21117
Last Revision: January 27, '97