SELECTED HALACHOS RELATING TO PARSHAS VAYISHLACH
By Rabbi Doniel Neustadt
A discussion of Halachic topics related to the Parsha of the
week. For final rulings, consult your Rav.
CLEANING GARMENTS ON SHABBOS
Laundering garments is prohibited on Shabbos for it is a toladah of one of
the thirty-nine Shabbos Labors, melaben, Bleaching. While laundering usually
entails the use of water and/or cleaning agents, removing dirt from a
garment even without them may also fall under the halachic prohibition of
Laundering. It is this type of Laundering which is the subject of our
REMOVING DUST or DIRT PARTICLES FROM A GARMENT
There is a dispute among the Rishonim whether or not removing dust or other
dirt particles from a garment is considered Laundering. Some hold that
removing any speck of dirt from a garment, even if it is not absorbed into
the fabric of the garment but is merely lying on its surface [like a feather
or a loose thread], is Biblically forbidden since the garment is being
transformed from "dirty" to "clean"(1). A second opinion maintains that
removing any dirt, whether it is absorbed into the fabric [like dust] or
not, is totally permitted, since a dusty garment is not considered dirty and
removing the dust is not considered Laundering(2). A third, middle-of-the
road view, holds that only dust which is trapped between the fibers of the
fabric may not be removed, while dirt which lies on the surface, may(3).
The basic halachah follows the middle-of-the-road opinion(4), forbidding
one to remove dirt that has been absorbed into the fabric(5) while allowing
one to remove a feather or a loose thread that has landed on the garment(6)
[using one's hands(7) or a soft, dry cloth; a brush may not be used(8)].
Accordingly, one should be careful not to let his clothing fall on the
ground and get dusty so that he does not come to desecrate the Shabbos(9).
If, however, one's clothes should get dirty from dust, there is a mitigating
factor which may permit removing dust from a garment:
Removing dust from a garment is only considered Laundering if the person
wearing the garment(10) is particular not to wear clothes in such a
condition. In other words, if the garment is so dirty that its owner would
not wear it(11), then cleaning it is considered Laundering. If the garment
is not significantly dirty, i.e., its owner would not refuse to wear it(12),
it may be cleaned so long as the following two conditions are met:
1.No brush is used.
2.The garment it is not shaken or scrubbed vigorously; it may be gently
shaken or lightly dusted only(13).
QUESTION: Can anything be done to a dusty garment [that is significantly
dirty] whose owner has no other suitable clothing and is embarrassed to be
seen publicly in such a dirty garment?
DISCUSSION: The poskim permit one to ask a non-Jew to remove the dust(14).
While generally one may not ask a non-Jew to do anything that a Jew is not
permitted to do on Shabbos, in this case he may, since as stated above,
there are opinions who maintain that it is even permitted for a Jew to
remove dust from a garment on Shabbos. [It is questionable, though, if one
may instruct the non-Jew to use a brush(15).]
If a non-Jew is not available and the owner is embarrassed to be seen in
public wearing a dusty garment, some poskim permit a Jew to clean the
garment, provided that it is cleaned in an unusual manner, e.g., with one's
REMOVING A STAIN FROM A GARMENT
Halachically speaking, there are two types of stains: 1) a wet stain which
is absorbed into the fabric of the garment, e.g., a ketchup stain; 2) a
stain which is made when a piece of dirt or food falls on a garment and
hardens there, leaving a stain(17). There are different rules for each of
A WET STAIN WHICH IS ABSORBED INTO THE GARMENT:
A stain which is absorbed into the fabric and can be removed only with
water or a cleaning agent is strictly prohibited to be removed on Shabbos.
This is the classic Biblical prohibition of Laundering. Even if the stain is
so insignificant that the owner will not be deterred from wearing the
garment because of it, it is still strictly forbidden to remove it with
water or any other cleaning agent.
If no water or cleaning agent is used, then it is permitted to remove the
stain if it is insignificant and would not deter the owner from wearing the
stained garment. If the stain is significant, however, it is prohibited to
remove it if the stain will be removed completely, i.e., it will leave no
mark whatsoever on the garment. If, however, the stain is only partially
removed - some mark will remain - it is permitted to be removed. Two
No brush may be used.
The stain may not be scrubbed away; it may only be gently wiped off with a
dry cloth or removed by hand, with a knife, etc(18).
DIRT WHICH ADHERES TO THE GARMENT'S SURFACE
A stain which results from dirt or food that has attached itself to a
garment can also be removed if it will be only partially removed or when it
is "insignificant", as explained earlier(19). It can be removed either by
scratching it off or by rubbing the reverse side of the material until the
dirt is dislodged.
There is, however, one notable difference between this type of stain and
the wet stain which became absorbed into the fabric of a garment. The
removal of this type of stain is subject to the laws of "Grinding", a
forbidden Shabbos Labor. If the dirt or food has dried or hardened,
scratching or peeling it off will cause it to crumble, a Rabbinical
violation of the prohibition against Grinding. Therefore:
If the garment was stained by mud and the mud has dried, it may not be
rubbed off - even if the stain is insignificant or will leave a mark -
because of the prohibition against Grinding(20).
If the garment is stained by unprocessed food which grows from the ground,
e.g., fruits and vegetables, it may not be removed because of the
prohibition against Grinding. But a stain from food which has already been
ground, like baby cereal, may be removed because Grinding does not apply to
previously ground food(21).
Beans or potatoes from cholent are not subject to the prohibition against
Grinding, since they are cooked so thoroughly that they are considered
"previously ground", and the prohibition of Grinding does not apply to
Even when the prohibition of Grinding applies, it is permitted - when
necessary - to ask a non-Jew to remove this type of stain on Shabbos(23).
1 Sefer ha-Zichronos, quoted by Magen Avraham 302:4.
2 Tosfos, Shabbos 147a and many other Rishonim.
3 Rashi, Shabbos, ibid. as explained by Rama and Gra 302:1, and other
4 Rama, Shulchan Aruch Harav and Aruch ha-Shulchan strongly recommend that
one be stringent and follow this view [but do not absolutely require it].
Chayei Adam and Mishnah Berurah, however, are of the opinion that the basic
halachah is in accordance with this view and one may not be lenient.
5 In theory, there may be some dust which lies completely on the surface of
the garment and is not absorbed into the fabric. In practice, however, this
is almost impossible to determine. [See Salmas Chayim, second edition, 283,
concerning surface dust on shoes.]
6 A minority view rules like the first opinion that even feathers and
threads are prohibited; Magen Avraham, quoted by Chayei Adam 22:9 and Kitzur
Shulchan Aruch 80:39; Ben Ish Chai, quoted by Kaf ha-Chayim 302:11. See also
Aruch ha-Shulchan 302:9 who rules like this view in the unlikely event of a
person who is reluctant to wear a garment because of the feathers, etc. See
Machazei Eliyahu 44-4.
7 Some poskim are concerned with the issue of muktzeh (See Shulchan Aruch
Harav 302:3 and Ketzos ha-Shulchan 116:3). To avoid the problem, the dirt
can be removed indirectly or via his body; Sha'ar ha-Tziyun 337:7. Other
poskim, however, are not concerend with the muktzeh issue; see Chazon Ish
47:21 and Shulchan Shelomo 302:5 and 302:12.
8 Beiur Halachah 302:1.
9 Mishnah Berurah 302:6.
10 It remains questionable whether or not another person [who is bothered by
the dirt] can clean the garment if the wearer himself is not particular;
Beiur Halachah 302:1 (s.v. v'hu). See Shulchan Shelomo 302:2-2.
11 This is determined by assessing the individual wearer's willingness to
wear a dusty garment on weekdays, even if he would not wear it on Shabbos,
Yom Tov or other special occasion; Harav S.Z. Auerbach (Shemiras Shabbos
K'hilchasah 15, note 89 and Tikunim u'Miluim).
12 While this is sometimes difficult to determine, there are two general
guidelines to follow: 1) One would normally be reluctant to wear dark (black
or dark blue) clothes which are dusty but not brightly-colored clothing; 2)
One would normally be particular not to wear new, or freshly laundered
clothes which are dirty, but would be less particular if the clothing were
obviously worn or faded.
13 Mishnah Berurah 302:36 and Beiur Halachah 302:1 (s.v. yeish) and 7 (s.v..
14 Mishnah Berurah 302:6.
15 Since this may be prohibited according to all views. If the non-Jew uses
the brush on his own, to make his job easier, he need not be stopped.
16 Misgeres ha-Shulchan on Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 80:80, quoted by Minchas
Shabbos 80:143. See Beiur Halachah 302:1 (s.v. lachush) who seems to rely on
this only when the garment is clearly not new or newly pressed. See also
She'arim Metzuyanim b'Halachah 80:36 who disagrees with this leniency.
17 A third type of stain is one where the food was neither absorbed into the
fabric nor dried and hardened; it merely remained on the surface and could
be easily flicked off, e.g. a noodle. This type of stain is permitted to be
removed according to most poskim quoted earlier, since it is similar to a
feather or a loose thread which may be removed.
18 Entire section based on the view of the Mishnah Berurah 302:11 and 36 and
Beiur Halachah (s.v. d'havi). This is also the view of Da'as Torah 302:7.
Note that there are poskim who are more lenient and allow a stain to be
removed even when it will be completely removed as long as it is not
scrubbed vigorously; see Aruch ha-Shulchan 302:9; Ketzos ha-Shulchan 116:3.
19 See pervious note that other poskim are more lenient and permit removing
stains as long as they are not scrubbed vigorously.
20 O.C. 302:7.
21 See Rama 321:12.
22 See Shemiras Shabbos K'hilchasah 6:9 and 15:28.
23 Mishnah Berurah 302:36 and Sha'ar ha-Tziyun 44.
Weekly-Halacha, Copyright © 2000 by Rabbi Neustadt, Dr. Jeffrey Gross and
Project Genesis, Inc.
Rabbi Neustadt is the principal of Yavne
Teachers' College in Cleveland, Ohio. He is also the Magid Shiur of a daily
Mishna Berurah class at Congregation Shomre Shabbos.
The Weekly-Halacha Series is distributed L'zchus Hayeled Doniel Meir ben
Hinda. Weekly sponsorships are available--please send email to the moderator, Dr.
Jeffrey Gross firstname.lastname@example.org.
The series is distributed by the Harbotzas Torah Division of Congregation
Shomre Shabbos, 1801 South Taylor Road, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44118--HaRav
Yisroel Grumer, Marah D'Asra