Hamaayan / The Torah Spring
Edited by Shlomo Katz
Volume XIII, Number 9
23 Kislev 5759
December 12, 1998
Tevul Yom 3:4-5
Orach Chaim 27:7-9
Yerushalmi Beitzah 14
The midrash introduces this parashah, in which we read that
Yosef's brothers hated him and sold him as a slave, with a verse
from Iyov (3:25), "Never did I feel secure, never quiet, never at
peace; and now, torment." The midrash expounds: "Never did I
feel secure - because of Esav; never quiet - because of Lavan;
never at peace - because of Dinah; and now, torment - because of
R' Aharon Lewin z"l (1879-1941; the "Reisha Rav") explains:
There is nothing as painful to a father as a fight between his
children, for children represent a father's hope for the future.
A parent's greatest desire is to see his children happy, to see
them growing without obstacles or frustrations; therefore, if the
children are at odds with each other, the parent's heart is
broken within him and all of life's troubles pale in comparison.
The verse quoted by the midrash summarizes Yaakov's life.
Yaakov faced many trials and tribulations in his lifetime, but
none of these dampened his spirits or depressed him - that is,
until the enmity between Yosef and his brothers broke out.
Experience shows that there is no war as bad as a civil war.
Throughout history, powerful nations have dominated their
neighbors and sown fear and dread into the hearts of smaller
nations. Yet, when these powerful empires have experienced
internal dissension, they have disappeared almost overnight. [Ed.
note: In our own time, the breakup of the Soviet Union is an
example of this phenomenon.] Yaakov knew how to deal with an
attack by Esav, by Lavan, or by Dinah's kidnappers.
Nevertheless, he was at a loss when it came to dealing with the
battle that raged in his own home. (Ha'drash V'ha'iyun)
"Yaakov settled in the land of his father's sojourns, in the
land of Canaan." (37:1)
Rashi writes: "Yaakov wanted to live in tranquility, but the
troubles with Yosef befell him [literally: 'jumped on him'].
When tzaddikim desire to live in tranquility, Hashem says, 'Is it
not enough for them that their portion in the World-to-Come
awaits them? Must they seek tranquility in this world as well?'"
Why should Hashem object if tzaddikim wish to live in
tranquility? R' Raphael Boruch Sorotzkin z"l (rosh yeshiva of
Telz) offers several explanations:
First, Hashem does not object to a tzaddik's living in
tranquility, but He does object to a tzaddik's wanting to live
such a life. A tzaddik's concern should be with the quality of
his life in the World-to-Come, not his life in This World.
Second, Yaakov's wish implied a desire to begin a spiritual
retirement, i.e., to stop growing spiritually and to live off of
his prior accomplishments. However, the purpose of life in This
World is to work and grow; spiritual retirement is reserved for
Third, perhaps Yaakov meant that it was time to "retire" from
worrying about the spirituality of others so that he could
devote more time to his own spiritual needs. To this, too,
Hashem objects, for it is every person's obligation to work
toward a world that is saturated with knowledge of Hashem.
"Reuven heard, and he rescued him [Yosef] from their
Did Reuven really save Yosef? He proposed throwing Yosef into
a pit full of snakes and scorpions! Also, the gemara (Sanhedrin
6a) says that one is prohibited from praising Yehuda for saving
Yosef from the pit. Why? Wasn't Yehuda's act greater than
R' Y. Stern z"l of Paris explains: True, Reuven's act might
have led to Yosef's death, but only his physical death. In
contrast, by proposing that Yosef be sold to Egypt as a slave,
Yehuda condemned Yosef to a spiritual death (i.e., a lesser
person than Yosef would have been swept up by the idolatry and
immorality of Egypt).
"Behold! A caravan of Ishmaelites was coming from Gilead...
Yehuda said to his brothers, 'What gain will there be if we
kill our brother and cover up his blood?'" (37:25-26)
The work, Melo Ha'omer, explains Yehuda's response to seeing
the Ishmaelites as follows:
According to the midrash, one of the reasons that Yosef's
brothers wanted to kill him was to prevent the birth of Yosef's
descendant, Yerovam ben Nevat, one of the most destructive
personalities in Jewish history. However, when Yehuda saw the
Ishmaelites, he remembered how Hashem had once spared Yishmael's
life because at that moment Yishmael was not deserving of
death. Though the angels argued that Yishmael should die because
he would father the Arabs, who would oppress the Jews, Hashem
spared Yishmael because he, personally, was not wicked at that
moment. (See Rashi to Bereishit 21:17)
Similarly, Yehuda reasoned, Yosef may be the ancestor of
Yerovam, but Yosef is not deserving of death now. Accordingly,
Yehuda saved Yosef from death.
(Quoted in Ma'ayanah Shel Torah)
"Yehuda said to his brothers, 'What betzah/gain will there
be if we kill our brother and cover up his blood?'" (37:26)
Making a play on the word betzah (which also means, "to slice
bread"), the midrash states: "If we kill our brother, can we
recite hamotzi?" R' Meir Yechiel of Ostrovtza z"l (died 1928)
explains as follows:
The gemara (Kiddushin 32b) relates: Rabbi Eliezer, Rabbi
Yehoshua and Rabbi Tzaddok were at the wedding of Rabban
Gamliel's son, and Rabban Gamliel was serving them.
Rabbi Eliezer refused to accept a drink from him, whereas
Rabbi Yehoshua accepted a drink. Rabbi Eliezer
reprimanded his colleague: "How is it, Yehoshua, that you
allow Rabban Gamliel to stand and serve us?"
Rabbi Tzaddok interjected, "How is it that you are more
worried about Rabban Gamliel's honor than Hashem's honor?
Does He not serve us by causing the wind to blow, the
rain to fall, and the crops to grow? Does He not set the
table for every person?"
R' Meir Yechiel continues: The reason that Yosef's brothers
sentenced him to death was that he claimed to be their king,
whereas the brothers recognized Yehuda (ancestor of King David)
as their king. Yehuda argued, however, that when we recite the
blessing of hamotzi and eat the bread that Hashem has produced,
we effectively recognize that a king (i.e., Hashem) can forgive
the honor due him. If so, how can we kill Yosef? Rather, I must
forgive my own honor.
(Meir Einei Chachamim Vol. III)
R' Nechemiah Beirach z"l
died 5612 (1851/52)
R' Nechemiah of Dubrovna, the son of R' Avraham Beirach, was
recognized by those who knew him as a great scholar, yet he lived
in obscurity (and remains relatively unknown today). To a rabbi
who once shared a train compartment with R' Nechemiah and, after
talking with him for several hours, expressed surprise that he
had not previously heard of R' Nechemiah, the latter related the
A peddler of books used to travel from town to town
selling his wares. Once, on a particularly hot day, he
arrived in a certain town and was invited to refresh
himself in the rabbi's house.
The peddler was awed by the rabbi's immense library, and
he said to the rabbi with great emotion, "Do you realize
how much money you could make by selling these books?!
What are you waiting for?"
The rabbi replied, "I am shocked by your question. Is my
library for sale?"
Although R' Nechemiah never held a formal rabbinic position, he
was asked many halachic questions and his answers to these are
published in Divrei Nechemiah. In addition, his glosses to the
Talmud are published in the standard Vilna edition (the edition
in common use today).
In his second marriage, R' Nechemiah was the son-in-law of
R' Chaim Avraham, son of R' Shneur Zalman of Liadi (founder of
Chabad chassidism). (Source: Gedolei Hadorot 606)
The Rozen and Donowitz families
on the 18th yahrzeit of mother
and grandmother Rita Rozen a"h
Copyright © 1998 by Shlomo Katz
and Project Genesis, Inc.
The editors hope these brief 'snippets' will engender further study
and discussion of Torah topics ("lehagdil Torah u'leha'adirah"), and
your letters are appreciated. Web archives at Project Genesis
start with 5758 (1997) and
may be retrieved from the Hamaayan page.
Text archives from 1990 through the present
may be retrieved from
to HaMaayan are tax-deductible.