This week’s parashah completes the book of Vayikra. R’ Moshe ben Yosef
Tirani z”l (the “Mabit”; Greece and Eretz Yisrael; 1505-1585) observes that
Vayikra has more mitzvot than any other book: 241. Devarim is next, with
200. A mnemonic with which to remember this is ”emet” (aleph-mem-tav) whose
gematria is 441 (=200+241). The other three books contain 172 mitzvot,
which can be remembered by the mnemonic, “eikev” (ayin-kuf-bet).
But *why* is the Torah divided into five separate books? Why was it not
given in one book?
Mabit suggests that the five books of the Torah commemorate the five
individuals who received parts of the Torah before it was formally given at
Har Sinai. These were: Adam and Noach, who received the seven Noachide
laws; Avraham, who received the mitzvah of milah; Yitzchak, the first person
who was circumcised on the eighth day after his birth; and Yaakov, who was
given the mitzvah of gid hanasheh.
Alternatively, the five books commemorate Amram and Yocheved and their
children, Moshe, Aharon and Miriam, through whom the Torah was given.
Or, the five books parallel the five places where parts of the Torah were
given: Egypt, Marah (in the desert), Har Sinai, the Ohel Moed/Tent of
Meeting, and the Wilderness of Moav.
Mabit adds: Some sources refer to the book of Bemidbar as three separate
books, yielding a total of seven. This could parallel the five recipients
of the Torah (see above) plus Moshe and Aharon, or it could parallel the
seven days of creation. (Bet Elokim, Sha’ar Hayesodot ch.32)
“If you will follow My decrees and observe My commandments . . .”
Rashi writes that “If you will follow My decrees” refers to toiling in Torah
study. If so, writes R’ Akiva Yosef Schlesinger z”l (Hungary and
Yerushalayim; died 1922), we can understand why this verse follows
immediately after the verse, “My Sabbaths you shall observe.” Specifically,
the Midrash Tanna D’vei Eliyahu states that the primary time for Torah study
is on Shabbat, when one is free from working. (Torat Yechiel)
“Then they will confess their sin and the sin of their forefathers . .
. and also for having behaved toward me with casualness. I, too, will
behave toward them with casualness . . . perhaps then their uncircumcised
hearts will be subdued, and then they will gain appeasement for their sin.”
Many commentaries wonder why the apparent repentance of verse 40 will be
rejected and why G-d will “behave toward them with casualness.” R’ Menachem
Mendel Stern z”l (1759-1834; rabbi of Sighet, Hungary) explains that this
confession is inadequate because it blames our sins on the way our parents
raised us (“their sin and the sin of their forefathers”), failing to
recognize that our parents may have sinned, but they did not rebel against
G-d. Only when the younger generation’s hearts--the seat of their
rebellion--are subdued, will they gain atonement. (Derech Emunah)
“I will remember My covenant with Yaakov and also My covenant with
Yitzchak, and also My covenant with Avraham I will remember.” (26:42)
The Gemara (Shabbat 55a) states that Zechut Avot--the merit of the
Patriarchs which protects us--has been exhausted. But, the Tosafot write,
Brit Avot--G-d’s covenant with the Patriarchs--has not been exhausted. This
is indicated in the above verse.
What is Zechut Avot and what is Brit Avot? R’ Yaakov Leiner z”l (Izbitzer
Rebbe; died 1878) z”l explains as follows:
The Patriarchs earned a great deal of merit for their remarkable good deeds.
This is called “Zechut Avot.” But, after all, what are man’s deeds
compared to G-d’s? In comparison with Hashem’s greatness, man’s good deeds
are like nothing. Thus, Zechut Avot, too, is like nothing, and has long ago
Yet, when the Patriarchs “gave-it-their-all,” they were in fact comparable
to G-d, who always has all of His abilities at His disposal. The Brit Avot
is that Hashem measures the Patriarchs by a yardstick appropriate to them,
not by His own yardstick. And, since they were perfect against their own
yardsticks, the Brit Avot will always protect us. (Bet Yaakov)
“Ben Zoma says, ‘Who is a wise man? One who learns from all people.”
R’ Yitzchak Berachiah z”l (Fano, Italy; 1583-1658) writes: The wisdom
referred to here is specifically the wisdom of the Torah. No person can
succeed on his own in knowing the entire Torah, no matter how intelligent
and understanding he is, because the Torah is (Devarim 33:4) “the heritage
of the Congregation of Yaakov,” collectively. Every Jew possesses his own
share of the Torah, according to the nature of his soul, and no one can
touch someone else’s share. This is alluded to by our prayer (at the end of
Shemoneh Esrei, among other places), “Give us *our* share in the Torah.”
Therefore, there is no way to become great in Torah except by learning from
all people. A person must even be willing to learn from those who are less
great than he. (Chanoch La’na’ar)
“Do not console your friend while his dead lies before him.” (Ch.4)
R’ Avraham Azulai z”l (1570-1643; Morocco and Eretz Yisrael) writes: One who
does so will appear to his friend to be his enemy. Rather, one must share
in his friend’s pain, as Iyov’s friends did (Iyov 2:13): “They sat with him
on the ground for a period of seven days and seven nights. No one said a
word to him, for they saw that his pain was very great.” (Ahavah Ba’ta’anugim)
A related halachah:
One who comes to console a mourner may not speak until the mourner speaks.
(Shulchan Aruch: Yoreh De’ah 376:1)
R’ Eliezer Yehuda Waldenberg z”l (1915-2006; member of the Yerushalayim bet
din and rabbi of Sha’arei Tzedek Hospital) writes: “I find this very
difficult in practice, as do many others, because more often than not, the
mourner doesn’t speak until he is prodded. Sometimes this is because of his
immense pain; other times, it is out of respect for distinguished visitors.
Yet, when one does prod the mourner to speak, it is contrary to an
expressly stated halachah with which no authority disagrees [as stated above].”
R’ Waldenberg continues, offering the following justification for speaking
before the mourner: Levush [R’ Mordechai Jaffe z”l (died 1612)] writes that
the reason for not speaking before the mourner is to give him a chance to
express his grief, before which it is not possible to console him.
Therefore, writes R’ Waldenberg, if the mourner doesn’t speak because his
grief prevents him from speaking, it is possible to speak first and console him.
Alternatively, R’ Waldenberg writes, the halachah that one may not speak
before the mourner speaks is learned from the fact that Iyov’s friends sat
quietly until he spoke [see above]. But, they were the very first visitors
who came to console him. Perhaps if the mourner has already spoken to
previous visitors, this halachah does not apply. (Tzitz Eliezer Vol.17, No.45)
R' Yom Tov Lipman Heller z”l (1578-1654) is best known as the author of
the Mishnah commentary Tosafot Yom Tov. In 1629, while serving as rabbi of
Prague, he was imprisoned on a false charge. That experience is the subject
of his memoir “Megillat Eivah”--literally, “The Scroll of Hatred.” In last
week’s excerpt, we read how R’ Heller obtained permission to travel to
Vienna on his own instead of being taken there in chains. He continues:
On Tuesday, 5 Tammuz, I set out. Around noon on the following Sunday, 10
Tammuz, I arrived in Vienna. They [the leaders of Prague] chose to send R’
Henne with me as an advocate. That very day, we went to the Chancellor’s
palace, but he wasn’t there. The next day I stood before him, and he spoke
to me harshly about the book Rabbeinu Asher [written in Spain in the 1300s;
today it is printed in the back of the standard Gemara] that I published
with two commentaries, Ma’adanei Melech and Lechem Chamudot. The Emperor
had been told that I had written against their beliefs and their faith,
things which should not be said. He went on at length.
I answered him: “G-d forbid that your servant would do such a thing!” I
explained that my books are about our Talmud, which is the Torah that Moshe
commanded us, and which is our faith. [They are not about *their* faith at
all.] I also explained that, when the Torah speaks about avodah zarah, it
refers to the worship of stars and constellations and various forms. . .
When I finished speaking, he said, “Sit in your lodgings and do not wander
outside, at the risk of punishment to your person and your property, for so
the Emperor has commanded.” When I pleaded with him, he said that the
Emperor wanted me to be thrown in prison immediately, but he had intervened
so that I would not be imprisoned. He also said that the matter would be
placed before a commission of knowledgeable people who know the language of
the Jews, and they will report to the Emperor.
-- To be continued --
The editors hope these brief 'snippets' will engender further study
and discussion of Torah topics ('lehagdil Torah u'leha'adirah'), and
your letters are appreciated. Web archives at Torah.org start with 5758 (1997) and
may be retrieved from the Hamaayan page.
Hamaayan needs your support! Please consider sponsoring Hamaayan in honor of a happy occasion or in memory of a loved one. The low cost of sponsorship is $36. Donations to HaMaayan are tax-deductible.
If Balak and Bilaam Were Here Today...
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5768
Is Sincerity at Steak?
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5761
Was G-d Bilaam's Agent?
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5761
Three Festivals: The Holy Journey
Rabbi Osher Chaim Levene - 5767
A Question Brings Hope
Shlomo Katz - 5765
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5770
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5762
Tents Where Torah is Studied
Shlomo Katz - 5767
Symbolism Over Substance
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759
Such a Rebbe!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5770
Balak: Can You See It?
Shlomo Katz - 5764
Found In Contempt
Rabbi Label Lam - 5764
Putting the Cart Before the Horse
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5763
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5759
Lishmah or Lo Lishmah?
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5774
Only A True Magician Succeeds
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5771