Permission to Confuse
Our parashah relates how Moshe sent Spies and they brought back a bad
report. We read (13:31), “But the men who had ascended with him said, *‘We
cannot ascend* to that people for it is too strong for us!’”
Later in the parashah we read (14:40): “They awoke early in the morning and
ascended toward the mountaintop saying, ‘We are ready, and *we shall ascend*
to the place of which Hashem has spoken, for we have sinned!’” (14:40)
What changed between the time that Bnei Yisrael accepted the opinion of the
spies that, “We cannot ascend,” and the time that Bnei Yisrael said, “We
shall ascend”? R’ Shneur Zalman of Liadi z”l (1745-1813; the Ba’al
Ha’Tanya) explains: In their hearts, all of the Jewish People are believers.
Sometimes, the yetzer hara manages to overcome a person and causes him to
act or speak contrary to his innate belief. That is what happened here.
However, as soon as Bnei Yisrael heard how angry Hashem was at their saying,
“We cannot ascend,” their evil inclinations immediately were subdued and
their emunah was able to express itself in the statement, “We shall ascend!”
Unfortunately, in the case of the Generation of the Wilderness, it was too
late to undo the damage that their words caused. Nevertheless, every person
can learn from this not to despair when heretical or immoral thoughts cross
his mind. The yetzer hara only has permission to confuse a person, but it
is never able to uproot a Jew’s core beliefs. (Likkutei Amarim, end of ch.29)
“[Kalev] said, ‘Aloh na’aleh / We shall surely ascend and conquer it,
for we can surely do it!’ But the men who had ascended with him said, ‘We
cannot ascend to that people for it is too strong for us!’” (13:30-31)
Why did Kalev repeat himself: “aloh na’aleh” – literally, “ascend we shall
ascend”? Shlomo Ephraim Luntschitz z”l (1550-1619; rabbi of Prague)
explains: Kalev meant, “It surely is possible to *ascend to Eretz Yisrael if
we first elevate ourselves through teshuvah and good deeds. Hashem
certainly can defeat the inhabitants of the Land, but we must prepare ourselves.
The other Spies disagreed. They replied, “If it depends on us, it is not
possible. Unless we can be sure that Hashem will have mercy, it is
hopeless, for it--the yetzer hara--is too strong for us.” (Kli Yakar)
What was wrong with the Spies’ argument? R’ Hershel Reichman shlita (rosh
yeshiva at Yeshivat Rabbeinu Yitzchak Elchanan / Yeshiva University) answers
that their logic may have been correct. Nevertheless, they were wrong
because Hashem promised that Bnei Yisrael would inherit the Land.
What led the spies, who Rashi z”l describes as great people, to err? R’
Reichman explains further: As the Kli Yakar implies, the spies didn't
believe that the generation that had been slaves was capable of elevating
themselves to the point where they could build a nation in Eretz Yisrael.
It would be better, the spies thought, for Bnei Yisrael to remain in the
protective cocoon of the desert and for their children to enter Eretz Yisrael.
R’ Reichman continues: This understanding of the Spies’ error explains why
they were punished so severely, i.e., with immediate death (see 14:37).
There simply is no room for a “leader” who does not believe in his flock;
such a person is no leader at all. (Heard from R’ Hershel Reichman shlita -
12 Sivan 5774)
From the same source:
“Chevron had been built seven years before Tzo’an of Egypt.” (13:22)
Rashi comments: The verse cannot mean that Chevron was chronologically older
than Tzo’an. Rather, Rashi writes, “Tzo’an must have been the best part in
the land Egypt since the residence of the kings was there, as is written
(Yeshayahu 30:4) ‘For in Tzo’an were its princes,’ yet Chevron was seven
times better than it.”
Surely Tzo’an was a city of grand palaces and boulevards! In what sense was
Chevron better than it? R’ Reichman explains:
Tzo’an was a beautiful city, as long as one looked only at the surface. In
reality, it was a city built by cruelly abused slaves and inhabited by an
immoral people. In contrast, Chevron was a graveyard, the burial place of
our Patriarchs and Matriarchs; on the surface, there is nothing beautiful
about Chevron. However, its pnimiyut / inner essence is truly beautiful.
It was that pnimiyut that ten of the Spies failed to see.
This week, we conclude our excerpts from “Megillat Eivah”--literally,
“The Scroll of Hatred”--a memoir by R' Yom Tov Lipman Heller z”l
(1578-1654), author of the Mishnah commentary Tosafot Yom Tov. In 1629,
while serving as rabbi of Prague, R’ Heller was imprisoned on a charge of
insulting Christianity in his writings. R’ Heller was sentenced to death,
but was given permission to ransom himself for 12,000 Reichsthaler in cash
[approximately 685 pounds of silver], payable immediately. In last week’s
excerpt, R’ Heller related that the ransom was reduced to 10,000
Reichsthaler, to be paid in installments. After listing, and blessing, the
people who gave or lent him money to pay the ransom, R’ Heller continues:
I have already accepted upon myself to be among those about whom the master
of wise men [King Shlomo] said (Mishlei 12:16), “One who conceals shame is
clever.” Therefore, I will not describe the great opposition that tried to
prevent others from giving guarantees for my ransom. I had many opponents
in Prague. In any event, they have already died, and their sin has been
removed . . .
While I was still in prison, before I received the guarantees--which, as
mentioned, were delayed in coming--the Chancellor informed the activists on
my behalf on Tuesday, the 18th of the month of Menachem [Av] that, by
command of the Emperor, I could no longer serve as rabbi of Prague. This
was worse in my eyes than everything else that had happened to me until
then. All of my prayers and my pleading before nobles and officials
accomplished nothing, and I was in great pain. I was left with no source of
income [at a time when he had undertaken large debts to pay his ransom].
But, Hashem gave me strength to withstand all of these misfortunes. Blessed
is Hashem forever, amen and amen.
On Friday, the 28th of Menachem [Av], the guarantees were received, and I
was released from imprisonment. His majesty, the Emperor, further showed me
kindness with regard to his decree that my books be burned. Instead, he
required only that certain words be erased from the copies that were in my
possession. [In subsequent printings, the names of R’ Heller’s books were
changed to avoid further bans.] . . . But, the decree regarding the
rabbinate, the Emperor would not annul. On this very day, at the conclusion
of 40 days, I left prison “clean”--as if to say, “empty-handed.” [See Shmot
21:28 and Rashi there.]
After many investigations, I found out who did this to me [i.e., caused me
to be banned from the rabbinate]; someone with a good reputation in the eyes
of the Emperor. I came before that man on Tzom Gedaliah 5390 , and
told him of my pain and suffering. I told him that I am not asking to
reclaim the fortune that was taken from me; only this I ask: to be returned
to my previous position. He responded, “I will tell you the truth. I did
not agree with the Emperor’s desire to take money from you. My goal was
only to have you removed as the rabbi. The reason for my enmity is that I
was told that you used to brag before the Governor of Prague and Bohemia
that you defeated me in debates when you lived here in Vienna.” I answered
him: “Look, please, my master, and from this you can judge the truthfulness
of all of my enemies’ lies. [When I was appointed rabbi,] I traveled from
here [Vienna] to Prague with ten wagons and many Jews who accompanied me,
and also ten soldiers to protect me on the road. Ask them when that
occurred, and you will learn that it was close to Pesach. That Governor of
whom you speak was dead and buried several months before my trip!”
Immediately, his attitude toward me changed. He said, “I cannot do anything
about the rabbinate, but I will seek another trade or profession for you and
will do everything in my power so that you can serve Hashem as you desire.
In the meantime, my home is open to you.” I told him that my only desire is
to be employed in G-d’s service [i.e., as a rabbi] . . .
[R’ Heller concludes his memoir by noting that the 40 days that he was
imprisoned were the same 40 days--17 Tamuz through 28 Menachem Av--that
Moshe Rabbeinu was on Har Sinai praying for Bnei Yisrael to be forgiven for
the sin of the Golden Calf, a fact that cannot be a coincidence. He further
describes his deliberations about whether to command his descendants to
observe the day of his release--28 Menachem Av--as a festival. Eventually
he concludes that he will not do so because his redemption was incomplete,
leaving him unemployed and in debt.
Approximately one year after our story ends, R’ Heller was appointed rabbi
of the city of Nemirov.]
The editors hope these brief 'snippets' will engender further study
and discussion of Torah topics ('lehagdil Torah u'leha'adirah'), and
your letters are appreciated. Web archives at Torah.org start with 5758 (1997) and
may be retrieved from the Hamaayan page.
Hamaayan needs your support! Please consider sponsoring Hamaayan in honor of a happy occasion or in memory of a loved one. The low cost of sponsorship is $36. Donations to HaMaayan are tax-deductible.
Worth the Struggle
Rabbi Label Lam - 5767
What's With the Number Four?
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5757
Chased by the Taste
Rabbi Label Lam - 5766
What is the Question?
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763
Another Link in the Chain
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5759
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5758
The Exit Strategy
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5767
The Evil Son
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5756
Pesach In Command
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5761
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5772
To Be Chosen Again
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768
A Holy Nation?
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755
A Ritual Memory Transfer
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5760
Rabbi Label Lam - 5767
The Passover Order
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5774
Maybe Next Year, in Jerusalem!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5768