Calling Collect and Shareware Trial Period
QUESTION 14: CALLLING HOME COLLECT WITH
A FICTICOUS NAME TO SAY THAT YOU HAVE ARRIVED
If a person is going on a trip, and he wants to
inform someone that he's arrived safely, is it
permissible to make a call with a fictitious name
as a signal to the other person?
RABBI BELSKY'S ANSWER
I really dislike this sort of thing, and don't
think it's permissible at all. It's gezel, thievery
in my eyes, and I don't see any way to permit it.
QUESTION 15: HOW STRICTLY SHOULD ONE ABIDE
BY THE 'TRIAL PERIOD' OF SHAREWARE SOFTWARE
Some software that can be downloaded for free
from the Internet comes with a provision that it
is free only for an "evaluation period", let's say
for thirty days, after which the software must be
bought or destroyed. How strictly must one abide
by this provision?
RABBI BELSKY'S ANSWER
If a person needs more time for the evaluation
period, I'm sure the company will not mind. It
can be thirty-one days, or thirty-five days --
as long as it is still an evaluation period.
When a person takes something for evaluation and
keeps it, it is, as Rabbi Moshe Feintstein said,
echt gezel (genuine theft).
I tell people constantly that no real success will
come from something a person takes -- a book, or
anything else -- that a person could buy, but
which he figured out a way to get without buying.
The person who produces the item wants to sell it.
Typically the justification that the person who wants
to use it gives to himself is that he wants to use
it for some grand purpose. But think: what value
does a grand purpose have that was achieved through
There's something called "share-ware" where a person
is supposed to pay a $20 registration fee. I think
the estimate is that not more than 5% of the people
who use shareware actually pay for it.
But that doesn't make it right not to pay for it.
If a person steals, he affects himself; the act affects
his soul. You can't steal something and then hope to
be the same person afterwards. It is important to
appeal to people on the basis of themselves.
So it is also between a person and himself?
NEXT WEEK'S QUESTION 16: COPYING TEXTBOOKS
My son asked me for $7 for his High School. When I
asked why, he said the school made full copies of three
textbooks for one of his courses. Was the school right
in copying those books?
NEXT WEEK'S QUESTION 17: BUYING A BOOK THAT
MIGHT HAVE BEEN COPIED
I was told that a certain edition of the Talmud had
photocopied the Soncino edition, and was guilty of
copyright infringement. I have no idea as to the
validity of those claims. Should I investigate these
claims before buying this other version (it is less
expensive), and if the claims turn out to have some
basis, should I refrain from buying this less
Participate in the Honesty Forum, and discuss the issues we confront in this class!
Subscribe to Honesty and receive this class via e-