Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Adding is Subtracting

By Rabbi Daniel Travis

But of the fruit of the Tree that is in the middle of the garden, the Almighty says, “Do not eat it, and do not [even] touch it, lest you die.” (Bereshith 3:3)

Adam added to God’s command not to eat from the tree when he told Chava that she may not even touch it. As a result, when the snake pushed Chava into the Tree of Knowledge and she saw that she did not die, she was enticed to eat of its fruit as well.1 Adam’s action set a precedent for future generations: anyone who adds to the truth of Torah will eventually come to subtract from it.2

The principal danger in adding to the words of the Torah is that human words may be in error. If people mistakenly think that words which someone has added are in fact part of the Torah, and those words are proven false, they will assume that the Divine part of the Torah is false as well. Adam said that something which God had permitted (i.e., touching the tree) was forbidden by God, and not just a fence to protect the law. It was wrong of him to add to the Torah.3 (When the Sages incorporate their own enactments into halachah, on the other hand, they expressly state that they are coming only to safeguard Torah law, not to add to it.)

Chava’s words also did not conform to what she was told. While Adam was guilty of adding to God’s words, Chava was guilty of subtracting from them. God had told Adam that eating from the Tree of Knowledge would surely cause death. Chava told the snake that she could not eat from the Tree lest she die. Her choice of words left some room for doubt whether or not she would actually die, and so the snake, capitalizing on Eve’s doubt, was able to convince her that the Almighty had “lied,” and that she would not die if she were to eat from the Tree.4

It is clear that changing the Torah can have very harmful repercussions, but what about simple exaggerations that work their way into normal conversations? May one add a few details to a story, for example, to make it more exciting? Although such “lies” may do no harm, exaggerating is a sign that one entertains a love for sheker. Cultivating this trait can accustom one to lying, and can lead one to other serious offenses such as bearing false testimony.5


1. Rashi on Bereshith 3:3.

2. Sanhedrin 29a.

3. Minchath Chinuch, Mitzvath Bal Tosif.

4. Seforno on Bereshith 3:3.

5. Sha’arei Teshuvah 3:181.


Text Copyright © 2006 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and Torah.org


 

ARTICLES ON BALAK:

View Complete List

Bilaam's Curses Transformed into Blessings
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5770

The Parah Paradox
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5756

You Can't Pick Your Cards...
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5757

ArtScroll

Building on Shaky Foundations
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5766

The Sod Of A Best-Seller
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5763

Another Productive Day!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5775

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Bilaam was a 'Spiritual' Man
Rabbi Label Lam - 5758

Friendly Enemies
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5774

A Generation Repents
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5761

> The Fourth Patriarch
Rabbi Yisroel Ciner - 5761

Making the Most of Our Days
Shlomo Katz - 5774

Partial View
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5757

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Prophet Motive
Rabbi Label Lam - 5761

Parshas Balak
Shlomo Katz - 5771

All Day Long
Rabbi Label Lam - 5767

Bilaam's Obsession
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5762



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information