Leaving it up to G-d, Part II
Chapter 6, Mishna 6, Way 48(b)
By Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld
"Torah is greater than priesthood and kingship, for kingship is acquired
with 30 qualities, priesthood is acquired with 24, whereas the Torah is
acquired with 48 ways. These are: ... (48) saying a statement in the name
of the one who said it. For we have learned that anyone who says a
statement in the name of the one who said it brings redemption to the
world, as the verse says, 'And Esther said to the King in the name of
Mordechai' (Esther 2:22)."
Last week we began discussing the importance of this quality, of properly
attributing that which one has heard from others. We posed two basic
questions. The first was that our mishna seems to attach much greater
significance to this quality than all the previous. Not only is it the
final way -- representing the apex and the final step towards achievement
in Torah, but our mishna places extra emphasis on it, promising that proper
attribution brings about redemption. What is so significant about this
quality, and what connection does it have to redemption? It seems, as we
observed, no more than an "ordinary" good quality, not qualitatively
different from the many other worthy traits our mishna ascribes to the
Torah scholar.
Second, we questioned the proof cited from the Book of Esther. The verse
tells us how Queen Esther warned King Ahasuerus -- in the name of her
cousin Mordechai -- of the plot against the King's life. As a result of
this, at a later crucial point in the story Mordechai gains favor with the
King, and Haman, archenemy of Mordechai and the Jews, falls into disfavor.
We asked, however, that this verse is frankly not all that convincing. The
Book of Esther is a much longer tale of Divine providence and inspiration.
Far more had to come together to bring about Israel's salvation. The
redemption was the result of much further-reaching Divine orchestration --
plus an inspiring degree of Jewish repentance -- rather than Esther's
single good deed. Her deed seems to be no more than a small cog in a much
larger series of miraculous occurrences.
Further, her good deed seemingly only "happened" to come to the fore at
just the right moment. The tide turned more because Ahasuerus has insomnia
and Mordechai's loyalty was brought to the King's attention just as Haman
was about to request permission to hang Mordechai. Was it Esther's deed
that did it, or did it simply happen, so to speak, to be at the right place
at the right time?
We then observed that the salvation of the Book of Esther is unusual in
another respect. The "heroes" of the story -- Mordechai and Esther --
actually *do* surprisingly little. They -- and especially Esther -- seem to
be passive throughout most of the Purim story. Most of the major events
happened *to* them: Esther is taken to the King's palace against her will,
she is chosen queen in spite of her doing virtually nothing to enhance her
beauty and preferability (see 2:15), Mordechai is granted honors by the
King (6:11), Ahasuerus chooses Mordechai over Haman. They seem to play a
very inactive hand in the salvation itself. They rally the people to
repentance through fasting and sackcloth, but most of the events which
saved Israel happened *to* them rather than being precipitated by them --
or so it seems. The actual salvation consisted of a remarkable series of
coincidences orchestrated and directed by G-d Himself. The human actors
were -- and saw themselves as -- mere pawns in the hands of an all-powerful
G-d.
There is an important lesson in this. Mordechai and Esther saw what the
true story of Purim was about: the manifestation of G-d's hand in human
affairs. G-d was running the show. They were not truly threatened by
Haman's decree to annihilate the Jews. It was Israel's religious laxity, in
particular their willing participation in Ahasuerus' forbidden feast (see
Esther 1:5 and Talmud Megillah 12a) -- a celebration in part commemorating
G-d's abandonment of the Jews in exile (see Talmud Megillah 11b). This
provided the spiritual vacuum which allowed a Haman to come to power. G-d
was the one punishing Israel; Haman was merely the rod of chastisement.
And so, Mordechai knew that persuasion, bribery, political machinations,
and Oriental haggling would never bring about salvation. They did not have
to *do* anything in the conventional sense. The Jews had to do one thing
only: make themselves worthy in *G-d's* eyes, to transform themselves into
a people G-d would *want* to save. And G-d would then rescue them as easily
and effortlessly as He would have destroyed them. G-d would work out the
details -- in a manner only He could devise and foresee. But that was not
their concern. Once G-d's favor was restored, Haman would be deposed,
Ahasuerus would soften, and perhaps biggest miracle of all -- the same
Jews, hated throughout the Book of Esther and for most of their history,
would just as easily and mysteriously "find favor" in the eyes of the
Gentiles, to be held in awe and esteem by all.
(This mysterious "finding favor" (or charm, "metsi'as chen" in Hebrew) is
actually a fascinating concept. Esther is constantly described as finding
favor in the eyes of her beholders -- though according to one opinion in
the Talmud, she wasn't exactly a royal knock-out (Megillah 13a). At the
time of the Exodus as well, Moses and the Jewish people are described in
similar terms -- as mysteriously becoming "popular" in the eyes of their
enemies the Egyptians, whom they were in the process of decimating (Exodus
11:3). My teacher R. Yochanan Zweig explained that the trait of favor / charm seems to function on an unknowable plane influenced by G-d alone. Such a person possesses a certain charm which cannot be
measured with our physical senses, but the beholder gets a sense there is
something special about this person -- something he can't quite put his
finger on. Such a person naturally becomes popular and admired. The media
just likes him, no rhyme or reason to it, and no one really knows why.)
This was the true message of the Book of Esther, one which Mordechai and
Esther, our "passive" heroes, recognized. The world is G-d's arena, not
man's. His hand truly guides the affairs of man. And when we see G-d's
directing Hand beneath the world's many layers of earthiness and apathy, we
are that much closer to salvation.
Thus, Mordechai and Esther sought not to take control of the situation, to
take forceful and reckless action, but to place themselves in G-d's hands.
They made themselves worthy of G-d's salvation -- to be agents of His will.
If we fully subordinate ourselves to G-d's wants, if we see Him as Master
Planner and ourselves as at best His worthy vessels, He may well select us
to be emissaries of His will -- as were Esther and Mordechai. Our deeds are
a reflection of G-d's will, and so G-d acts through us. If, however, we
attempt to run the show by ourselves, to impose our own wills and agendas
upon G-d's world, G-d will have to work against us, so to speak, bringing
His master plan to fruition in spite of all our ill-conceived and
hair-brained schemes (for lack of better term).
This is precisely what Mordechai and Esther did. They were devoid of their
own "agenda", of attempting to figure out and solve the world's problems on
their own. They saw themselves simply as actors in a drama only G-d could
fathom and direct. And so they simply followed the script: they observed
the Torah as best they could, prayed, repented, and waited for Divine cues
to act on behalf of Israel.
Thus, Esther's deed -- selflessly passing along Mordechai's report --
summed up precisely the spiritual quality which precipitated the
redemption. Esther recognized that G-d was truly the One bringing all
things about. She was simply an agent of His will. She had no reason for or
interest in taking credit for herself. These were not *her* deeds or
initiatives; *she* was not attempting to be Israel's savior. She was merely
carrying out G-d's will, or better: allowing G-d to act through her. It was
G-d saving Israel, using her as His agent. And quite the opposite of taking
credit for herself, she had been granted the privilege to function as
emissary of G-d, a mission she humbly and admirably fulfilled. Thus,
Esther, our self-effacing hero, was entirely devoid of selfishness and
agenda, practically devoid of self. And so, G-d's will shined through her
all the more powerfully. She became devoted emissary of G-d's wishes, a
pure expression of His will, and her "charm" was a whole reflection of His
infinite glory.
The same is true of Torah study. To the extent we see our Torah study as
our own accomplishment, as a reflection of our own greatness, it is selfish
and finite. We will be tempted to take credit for ourselves -- not only for
our own Torah thoughts, but for those of others. Our Torah will not be a
reflection of G-d's wisdom but of our own worthy but finite intellectual
endeavors. One, however, who selflessly attributes his teachings to their
correct sources, will come to see himself merely as G-d's agent. And
ultimately, he will be studying G-d's Torah rather than his own. His Torah
study will become an act of G-d -- of G-d's disseminating -- through him --
His Torah to mankind. He is simply the humble and unworthy vehicle. And he
is humbled and awed as much as proud.
Thus, this quality, the final of the 48 Ways, is the culmination of all
the previous. I may possess all the good qualities in the world, but if I
see them as my own greatness and wisdom, there is something inherently
limited and selfish about it. As great as my talents and qualities are,
they are mine alone. Only when I am prepared to let go, when I selflessly
see my deeds as a fulfillment of G-d's will, do my deeds become G-dly. And
only then do they become true reflections and expressions of G-d's infinite
glory.
Text Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld and Torah.org.