Torah.org Home Subscribe Services Support Us
 
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Inconsistencies

By Rabbi Daniel Travis

Yosef said to his brothers, “I am Yosef! Is my father still alive?” His brothers were so startled that they could not respond. (Bereshith 45:3)

From the time the brothers returned to Egypt with Binyamin, all their conversation with Yosef had focused upon their father Yaakov. There could have been no doubt in Yosef’s mind that Yaakov was alive. Why then did Yosef ask the question again? And why were the brothers unable to answer him? On another level, the Midrash comments on this verse that if the sons of Yaakov found it impossible to answer their younger brother, how much more will we be dumbstruck when it comes to answering God on the final Day of Judgment (1). How does the Midrash derive this? What is the connection between these two events?

Yosef’s brothers had made a powerful appeal to him to release Binyamin because of the pain that his captivity would cause their father. When Yosef revealed himself with the words, “I am Yosef; is my father still alive?” he conveyed to them that if they were really concerned about their father’s welfare, they should have taken his pain into consideration when they sold Yosef into slavery many years earlier. As soon as they heard Yosef’s words, the brothers realized the extreme inconsistency of their actions, and so were unable to respond to Yosef.

God effectuates His judgment in a similar manner. Thus when life ends, as a person appears before God to be judged, if he attempts to defend his paltry philanthropic activity by claiming that he lacked financial resources to cover his basic expenditures, God will show him all the times in his life he spent money frivolously. Confronted with his own actions, he will find himself unable to respond (2).

Rav Meshulem Faivish from Zebriz, author of “The Way of Truth,” writes that he once felt a strong desire to fulfill the mitzvah of tefillin in a way that surpassed anyone else’s fulfillment of that mitzvah. In addition to wearing the tefillin accepted by most halachic opinions, he wanted to don another set considered a hiddur mitzvah (an enhancement of the mitzvah) according to some opinions. After extensive thought he decided to abandon this idea. He reasoned, had his intentions been true, his desire to wear the standard tefillin should have been equally strong. Since he felt no exceptionally strong drive to perform the standard mitzvah of tefillin, he concluded that reasons other than the truth were pushing him to wear the additional set (3).


1. Bereshith Rabba 93:10.
2. From the commentary of the Beis HaLevi on Bereshith 45:3.
3. MiDevar Sheker Tirchak p. 101.



Text Copyright © 2007 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and Torah.org


 






ARTICLES ON DEVARIM AND THE THREE WEEKS:

View Complete List

9th of Av: Reasons for Fasting - Part 2
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5758

Children are a Gift
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5762

What Are We Mourning?
Rabbi Yosef Kalatzky - 5771

ArtScroll

Payment in Full
Rabbi Naftali Reich - 5766

Body Language
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5771

To See or Not to See - That is the Question
Rabbi Yosef Kalatzky - 5762

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

Small Allusions
Rabbi Chaim Flom - 5767

Rebuking 101
Shlomo Katz - 5765

Taking Stock
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5757

> Don't Flaunt It
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5764

Murphy's Day
Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5761

Small Favors
Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5772

Looking for a Chavrusah?

Shabat Outweighs the Ninth Day of Av
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5772

The Speech That Never Ends
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5764

Elusive Allusions
Rabbi Yaakov Menken - 5764

Immortal Teacher
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5760



Project Genesis

Torah.org Home


Torah Portion

Jewish Law

Ethics

Texts

Learn the Basics

Seasons

Features

TORAHAUDIO

Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base




Help

About Us

Contact Us



Free Book on Geulah!




Torah.org Home
Torah.org HomeCapalon.com Copyright Information